Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Red Deck Wins | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Red Deck Wins | kakashi_ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Red Deck Wins | csalles | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Red Deck Wins | kollslaw | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Gruul Aggro | maxmedeiros | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Boros Aggro , Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Equipments , Boros Mice , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Counters , Gruul Delirium , Gruul Leyline , Izzet Aggro
Emberheart Challenger ranks #189 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 47%).
Red average: 67.0%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Emberheart Challenger is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 18.59 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.7%. Emberheart Challenger has a win rate of 71.5%, making it 2.9% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Flowstone Infusion | Instant | 6 | 100.0% | 6 |
Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 6 | 92.9% | 5 |
Surrak, Elusive Hunter | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 5 | 77.4% | 2 |
Desperate Measures | Instant | 13 | 76.4% | 5 |
Cunning Coyote | Creature — Coyote | 9 | 75.1% | 4 |
Furnace Reins | Sorcery | 23 | 73.0% | 12 |
Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 75 | 69.5% | 16 |
Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 45 | 69.2% | 14 |
Duress | Sorcery | 68 | 67.0% | 17 |
Bulwark Ox | Creature — Ox Mount | 6 | 66.7% | 3 |
Cards that perform better with Emberheart Challenger than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 2 | 6 | 90.6% | 74.1% | +16.5% |
Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 7 | 81.4% | 72.4% | +9.0% |
Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 1 | 5 | 81.0% | 73.3% | +7.7% |
Feed the Swarm | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 78.6% | 72.7% | +5.9% |
Lightning Helix | Instant | 2 | 9 | 80.0% | 75.1% | +4.9% |
Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 15 | 76.1% | 71.2% | +4.9% |
Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 75.0% | 71.0% | +4.0% |
Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 9 | 78.2% | 74.3% | +3.8% |
Mabel, Heir to Cragflame | Legendary Creature — Mouse Soldier | 3 | 8 | 78.0% | 74.8% | +3.2% |
Shock | Instant | 1 | 5 | 83.3% | 80.2% | +3.1% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Aggro | 2041 | 98.9% | 47.3% |
Red Deck Wins | 1340 | 98.1% | 52.8% |
Boros Burn | 343 | 87.7% | 51.6% |
Gruul Leyline | 187 | 97.9% | 57.0% |
Boros Auras | 64 | 97.0% | 58.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.